Here we go, kids. If you’re interested in drama, welcome aboard the train to God knows where this will end up, but probably not well.
First, let me say that what I am doing is on my own behalf. I am not speaking for anyone other than myself and the only blog represented by this post is my own.
Shortly after I started writing for MamaPop, I was referred to a post by Anna Viele, listing her observations on the life of male bloggers. The post seemed a little bitter to me, but whatever. Her opinion is hers. In it she would basically say that one of the stages of a male blogger’s life (before we vanish into obscurity or are lucky enough to get a book deal) is becoming an unpaid writer for MamaPop.
I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but I’m a male blogger and, at the time, one of seven male writers on staff at MamaPop, so it was difficult not to take it personally. I’m new to this world and I doubt she was talking about me specifically, but she was certainly stereotyping and attacking a small group of which I’m a part.
Additionally, blogging is in its infancy. This woman laying out the path of a male blogger’s existence (based on their having penises) and predicting their futures based on her observations over a few years is ridiculous. It’s like planning out the path of publishing ten years after the printing press was invented.
Then, in what can only be described as the greatest thing ever, bhj changed his avatar on twitter to Jesus flipping a bird and gave a special shout out to Anna correcting her false assumptions she off-handedly *reports* as facts. I say *reports* because this woman fancies herself a journalist, when it’s clear her personal feelings, axes to grind and bitterness fuel her writing.
The bhj flip-off would be called “unprofessional”, which I thought was pretty funny considering that Anna’s own twitter profile page featured a photo of her flipping off the camera. (She probably learned that from Katie Couric.) A couple of other writers would join in and say some nasty stuff to her on twitter (not me, but I really wanted to) and she would go on to do a follow-up story on the whole thing.
First, I’m new to blogging and honestly, I haven’t seen a ton of what I would call “professionalism”. In fact, the fun of it is how “unprofessional” it is. At MamaPop, we opened a community called SparkleMotion. We were going to call it “Place where professionals come to talk about their blogging finances,” but we shortened it.
Before you join, this is the message you see:
Monkeys and Robots cannot prepare you for the awesome that is contained within this community. Plus it’s now powered by 100% pure high-grade Sparkle Motion. Yeah, you read that right. So climb aboard and join the fun! Just don’t be a dick.
Pretty much your standard terms and conditions. We want to be sure when we’re talking about our banking shit that everyone understands how serious we are. And if you want to come over there, we might ask you how much money you make. You better just tell us or we’ll say nasty things about you.
A couple of commenters on her follow-up post would say something along the lines of, ”They wouldn’t respond to the Wall Street Journal that way.” Actually, I would. Suck my balls, WSJ. It’s none of your business. Vagina.
But aside from that:
A) Do the Wall Street Journal writers use a public profile photo of flipping off the camera? Comparing this woman to the Wall Street Journal is like comparing my theories on proper butter to crab ratios to the theory of relativity.
B) When you attack 20 snarky writers on team unicorn, what the fuck do you expect? I didn’t join Microsoft. I joined a team of comedic writers. If you want professionalism, I’ll refer you anywhere other than where I am.
C) Did I miss the part where someone appointed her “the news”? And when did MamaPop become a publicly traded company in which it’s obligated or required to publicize its revenue? Her personal curiosity or even yours doesn’t make it anyone’s business. She even went as far as to run the numbers and estimate what the site made. Who’s fucking business is this? It’s like me asking you how much you make, and when you don’t tell me, I do what I can to analyze your company, position and what you do for them, come up with a reasonable average of what a person in your position makes and then write a post about how much money I think you make. What the fuck? Who is this person?
In her follow-up, she would send an e-mail to all of the writers asking us to comment on whether or not we are paid. In words, I told her it was none of her business. One of the writers called her a link-baiting taintface, also called “unprofessional” by a couple of people. To those I bare my ass and slap it, while cupping my balls and saying, “I’ve got your professionalism right here.”
I’m not writing for MamaPop for the money or even writing for the money. That would be really dumb. I do it because I love it. To some, it’s a business and maybe one day it will be for me. But the one thing it will never be is “professional”, and if the day ever comes (again) when someone writes an out-of- left-field post saying I make nothing, I correct her by saying “you’re a douche,” then this person sends me an e-mail telling me she’s doing a story on how much I make and has applied her own formula and run the numbers to estimate what she thinks I make and plans to tell the world, link-baiting taintface will be one of the many names I assign her. In the immortal words of bhj,

Now here’s where this gets interesting. The above was just a little background before the fun gets started.
I don’t know all of what’s going on here and know nothing about the Blogher Ad Network. As you can see, I have no ads, so I’m not going to pretend I know anything about this stuff. But apparently Anna began writing a series of posts regarding the Blogher Ad Network and the addition of The Pioneer Woman. She would then go on to explain (using charts and graphs) that the ad network had some kind of tier system which I also won’t pretend to understand or try to.
The Blogher Ad Network would then terminate Viele’s contract, their reasons being that she was reporting falsehoods they could easily disprove, in addition to her falsely reporting traffic stats.
She would then claim that Blogher issued her a cease and desist regarding her series of posts, but… there was no cease and desist regarding her posts. A representative for Blogher stated that they received a letter from Anna Veile’s attorney saying that if they settled with her for $150,000, the posts would end.
Really, Anna? Now that’s journalistic integrity. ”Pay me and I’ll stop writing bad stuff about you.” (She must have learned that from Mike Wallace.) Thanks for getting us the news we need to hear, Anna. I hope people continue to not pay you so we can get your unbiased opinion on their evil.
Anna would then clear things up for us, saying that the letter she received from Blogher wasn’t *officially* about her posts, but was a letter telling her not to contact them ever again. So, all of you who follow Anna can assume one of two things:
A) She misrepresented the document in a big way
B) She doesn’t know the difference between a cease and desist regarding published content and a letter telling her to contact their attorney if she has anything else she would like to say.
So, clueless or liar? You pick. It is that cut and dry. Either would mean you shouldn’t listen to a word she says.
In her last post of the series where she would clarify her *mistake* and in the comments section Redneck Mommy would accuse Anna of threatening her, Anna replying that RedneckMommy’s statement was a perfect example of libel and defamatory, which for a woman who can’t translate a legal document is an astute legal observation. It sounds to me the letter she received more resembled a restraining order than a cease and desist to stop her posts.
So what do we have? A journalist flying under the banner of professionalism with a twitter profile of her flipping off the camera, calling the same activity “unprofessional”. Hypocrite. Check.
Someone we know, for a fact, reports misinformation. Whether or not it’s to manipulate you or cluelessness is anyone’s guess. Check.
If what Blogher says is true (and I’m sure they can prove it) a person who would offer to stop reporting the news we so desperately need to hear in exchange for a large sum of money. Check.
Anna would now just like to move on. Ahhh… good for her. Too bad. She’s a litigious bully and she would gladly keep her mouth shut if someone slaps a load of cash in her pocket. A journalist that does not make.
She wrote falsehoods about Blogher. They canned her. End of story. Not “Stop writing posts about us,” more simply, “You’re fired, leave us alone.” She would then try to convince you they tried to get her to stop writing the posts, which they did not do. They simply disassociated with her in a very rapid way, as would any advertiser. Then, according to them, she tried to get them to pay her to stop writing her posts. Viele sad it was a settlement offer for the termination of her contract.
Seems to me if she doesn’t sue them, we’ll know who is telling the truth.
In her final post on the subject, Viele would go on to say that Blogher spent thousands on a Silicon Valley law firm and they were “trolling” her site all day, my guess in an attempt to further show Blogher’s great interest in her exposing them, but when a litigious nut demands $150,000 “settlement” from you, you hire an attorney.
If the Blogher attorneys were trolling her site, it was to simply gather, in a timely manner (before she could delete them, maybe), the falsehoods she reported that led to her contract being terminated. I like to call that, “duh.”
How stupid does she think we are? She’s a self-proclaimed business expert, for God’s sake. She would like you to believe that what is absolutely standard practice when someone legally threatens you is some kind of conspiracy to take her down, when they just want her to go away. It borders on megalomania.
Again, I know nothing about the ad network. I know some people have problems with it. I can’t speak to those and this has nothing to do with that. This is about one woman who went on the attack, printed misinformation and got what she deserved.
Anna may choose to acknowledge this or not. She may try to sue me. Bring it. I have a cool chair and a tv. That’s about it. I’ll pee on both before you get your hands on them.
I’ll reiterate I’m alone here and I apologize for any backlash this may bring my friends. For me, this is personal and I make no bones about it. I despise bullies. She uses her voice for leverage and spin, and in the short time she’s been on my radar, I’ve seen her attack me and my friends and now more than one person is accusing her of using her pulpit to hurt them if they don’t comply.
Sometimes where there’s smoke, there’s fire.
You’ll also notice I didn’t link to her. There’s a reason for that. Where I did link was to the story on She Posts which has been updated, but I have no interest in sending her any direct traffic from here. The article says it all.
Comments for Men